The right of veto, we often hear in the political news, the use of state veto power over a particular decision, what is the meaning of the word veto, we'll show you the veto is a Latin word origin, has this word dramatically emerged after World War II ended, and the meaning of the word veto is " I object to, or I do not agree and criticized, "has been appearing after World war II, where the United Nations body which emerged, including the Security Council, and its role was established is to take crucial decisions and important at the international level, and the members of the Security Council is change them all the time, and there five countries have been appointed as the five permanent members, which means that a continuous presence and expressed in the Security Council and the countries that has the right to veto any has the right to veto.
The right to veto, is one of the rights possessed by the great powers in the world, and define more precisely is a unjust rights existing in the Security Council, and the veto power of this which is in the hands of the great powers that use it to serve their interests only, without considering any other considerations, you may lose the Security Council credibility of the whole, as the great powers control the Security Council resolutions, and these countries that control of any decision by the Security Council are the United States, China, Russia, France, Britain, these are the countries controlling the issuance of any decision, as they objected to the any decision is contrary to their interests or the interests of their friends "friendly countries", where you turn the decision without being traded or passed, even, albeit this decision is approved by everyone, as long as these countries have a veto means that it has been pre-empt that decision, and gone forever.
What is meant by a veto: the veto is a veto from the five permanent members to reject any decision without passage of the Security Council to be voted on, and thus are canceled and not to discuss it and thus failure to perform, and have it to reject one of its five permanent this decision.
We find now there are a number of voices calling for change this unjust exclusion and unfair, as the five countries permanent members use the veto power, resulting in a balance of forces fresh, and injustice is not worthy of the United Nations established the basis for upholding the right, but where the right or justice and Where is the equality in the existence of this right of others equitably and call it a right of veto, and even if we accept this thought and logic arrogant, there is a major and states with larger states that have permanent membership in the Security Council effect.
The right of veto is no objection to the only decision, it is a miscarriage and termination resolution without irreversible, and this is a major flaw of democracy advocated by the states, and the problem is not in the same resolution, but the method of selecting members of the veto and who are selected by the Security Council and they shall be members or wielding members of the Security Council, they have not been selected, but the election is to form a strong, so many countries have called for the abolition of the right of veto, and demanded that other countries be modified veto system and be included major countries such as Germany, Japan and Brasil.
Do you think that Veto is a miscarriage solution? Leave a comment with all arguments, we will discuss it together
